Underverse[] -vs- Condor[] (TD: ~1M)

Posts : 36 Join date : 2008-08-15

The following fleets met in battle:

Attacker: Underverse
Weapons: 90% Shields: 90% Armour: 90%
S.Cargo...99
Battleship...23
Battlecr....40

Defender: Condor
Weapons: 80% Shields: 90% Armour: 80%
L.Cargo...3
Cruiser...3
Recy....4
Esp.Probe...40
R.Launcher...3
L.Laser...3
H.Laser...7
Gauss...10
Ion C....3
S.Dome...1
L.Dome...1

-- After battle --

Attacker: Underverse
S.Cargo...81 ( -18 )
Battleship...23 ( -0 )
Battlecr....40 ( -0 )

Defender: Condor
Destroyed

The attacker has won the battle!
He captured
229.247 metal 66.151 crystal and 88.338 deuterium

The attacker lost a total of 72.000 units.
The defender lost a total of 783.000 units.
At these space coordinates now float 46.200 metal and 41.700 crystal.

Battle Result
(Assuming the attacker got the debris..)
Attacker gain: 399.636
Defender lost: 783.000
Total Damage: 855.000

Converted with Invader Skodge's CR Converter 3.5

Subject: Re: Underverse[] -vs- Condor[] (TD: ~1M) Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:05 pm

shit dude. your like kicking our cr sections ass. great hit man!!!!

good to know we have a good fleeter starting up the ranks. Smile

Posts : 170 Join date : 2008-08-08 Age : 33

you might want to try LC though
i dont know if you use SC for speed or whatever, but LC seem to live longer in battle, so you wont have as many losses
also, they cost less deut

Posts : 115 Join date : 2008-08-08 Age : 34

If you want to be a fleeter, you might want to up your techs too. As the hits get bigger, you'll need better techs. Most people tend to say 11/11/11 is good.

but I agree with GRM, you do seem to be owning the CR section. It's good to see! Very Happy

Posts : 416 Join date : 2008-08-07

indeed, congrats on the hit ^^ keep them coming

Subject: Re: Underverse[] -vs- Condor[] (TD: ~1M) Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:21 pm

ya dude up those techs man you have to be reaching me on fleet
but go to lc they are slow but you are using bcs so it isnt going to affect anything

Posts : 36 Join date : 2008-08-15

yeah im working on the techs now Smile

and I sent the SC to die lol

I figure if I don't have them anymore I won't use or rebuild them.

SC just dies so fast. LC live much loner.

Subject: Re: Underverse[] -vs- Condor[] (TD: ~1M) Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:52 am

still keep small cargo they work well with cruisers for fast raids

Subject: Re: Underverse[] -vs- Condor[] (TD: ~1M) Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:45 am

you guys are confusing me., haha

Subject: Re: Underverse[] -vs- Condor[] (TD: ~1M) Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:47 am

Good hit there dude, well done.

Tech wise though, defiantly aim for 11/11/11 asap if you intend to raid often ^^

Posts : 36 Join date : 2008-08-15

It will take me 4 days to get 10/10/10, and i think two weeks or more to get 11/11/11 and probably a month and a half up to 3 months to get 12/12/12 Very Happy

lol thats because I only have a single research lab of level 10 Razz

I know I should up my techs more.

I just wanted to get a big enough fleet to make over a or two mil in res from attacking daily. Then I could focus on research , defense, and planet development.

Right now I can make 500k-1 mil in res daily on average, 1-2 mils if I try hard or get lucky.

If I want to have an average income of over 2 mil in resources I need to have like computer tech level 20 or something Smile

more fleet slots helps a lot.

Posts : 416 Join date : 2008-08-07

haha, so i see youre a hardcore fleeter Very Happy

you should pay RL money and get the officer that gives you the extra 2 fleetslots, ive heard that it helps alot for people that only get income from fleeting.
do you have good mine income?

Posts : 36 Join date : 2008-08-15

All my mines combined I make 30k/per H, 14k/per H, and 5k/per H of metal, crystal and deuterium.

With attacking I double what I get, sometimes tripple on a good day.

Subject: Re: Underverse[] -vs- Condor[] (TD: ~1M) Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:46 pm

nice dude. you are an amazing addition to our alliance. Smile

» Underverse[] -vs- Condor[] (TD: ~1M)
» Underverse[] -vs- K_Bailey_83[] (TD: ~1M)
» Underverse[] -vs- charginmahlazer[] (TD: ~2M)
» Underverse[] -vs- michaelboy88[]
» Underverse[] -vs- pegasus[] (TD: ~3M)